1. Calibre11

    Calibre11 Editor of Calibre11.com Staff Member May 4, 2019

    Posts
    5,623
    Likes
    9,040
  2. Calibre11

    Calibre11 Editor of Calibre11.com Staff Member Jun 8, 2019

    Posts
    5,623
    Likes
    9,040
  3. Yago

    Yago Jun 8, 2019

    Posts
    681
    Likes
    753
    Seriously, from the 3rd revolution in the ‘70s they’re jumping to the 4th revolution of the Isograph. I get that they don’t call the early 2000’s Autavia a revolution (although nicer watches than the Isograph), but leaving out the 02 Autavia cup??
     
  4. Hubert

    Hubert Jun 8, 2019

    Posts
    6,836
    Likes
    5,358
    I like the new direction in the way the catalogue is laid out.

    Nice NATO:
    upload_2019-6-8_22-32-50.png
     
  5. Hubert

    Hubert Jun 8, 2019

    Posts
    6,836
    Likes
    5,358
    Yes, I found that odd too. I think they found it so hard to compete with the "classics/reissues" that maybe they thought it was probably better to avoid reminding people about them.
     
  6. Calibre11

    Calibre11 Editor of Calibre11.com Staff Member Jun 9, 2019

    Posts
    5,623
    Likes
    9,040
    Could well be...I guess they were trying to mark out the shift towards an aviation-themed 3-hand watch...but agree that this is a fairly “high level” history that ignores a few important links in the chain
     
  7. Aquagraph

    Aquagraph Jun 14, 2019

    Posts
    4,135
    Likes
    3,458
    Only just seen this thread... glad to be of assistance!:)
     
    Calibre11 likes this.